The IT team was pleased with the effort and congratulated each other for
the delivery. The team had worked hard with the development partner to meet
aggressive timelines and delivered for UAT a few days early. But that is when
the problem started; the team working on the UAT came up with many exceptions
that poked holes in the solution; a process not captured well, some processes
missing and absent data elements. It was like IT was from Mars and the business
was from Venus and they blamed each other.
The CIO was peeved off by the disconnect; the vendor with high pedigree
and domain expertise had been carefully and jointly chosen; the business had
offered domain experts with good standing, and the IT team understood the
technology well enough. So the CIO did some quick checks on the delivery versus
expectations and discovered that the IT team knew the business though the understanding
was not as deep as it appeared to be. There were translation losses with implicit
assumptions by the business and IT.
I think the drums started beating almost a decade back on the need for
the CIO to become business savvy. It was about understanding business
operations so that the written and articulated processes are translated it into
a solution that meets business expectations. The origin of this was the nemesis
of what everyone called scope
creep and resultant change requests that escalated cost and created
time overruns such that the end solution at times became irrelevant to the
business; bridging the gap was necessary and critical.
The CIO also had aspirations to get a seat on the Management Committee
or the Operating Board or equivalent leadership team. Discussions in these
meetings largely did and continue to focus on topline, operating efficiency,
bottom line; essentially discuss monthly performance and numbers. Some teams had
graduated to reviewing competitive activities and customer engagement while the
more evolved ones discussed strategies and more openly. For the CIO to get
there it was imperative that s/he understand, participate and contribute.
It took some effort and humility to make the grade, while some for
whatever reason did/could not; the fruits of the effort were worth the struggle
and more. As a business partner the CIO enjoyed the perks of being in the team
and on the table working lockstep with other CXOs. Having a bird’s eye view of
the business and a pulse of operations, the CIO stitched together the missing
pieces of the jigsaw that made up the business. The transition to a business
leader brought new aspirations which resulted in lateral or upward movement for
a few.
The IT team reveled in the success and leadership position taken by the
CIO; the adulation apart some of them attempted to follow the CIO’s footsteps
that led to the transformation. The CIO was happy in his/her new found position
and willingly coached anyone who wanted to follow the path. Key lessons
revolved around the not so obvious soft skills which help in building
relationships; s/he also stressed the need to know the chosen function or
domain as well to be seen as a subject matter expert internally as well as
externally.
Attempting to get to the bottom of the imbroglio, the CIO realized that
the IT team involved in the project had not fully imbibed the learning citing
paucity of time and work pressures. They had sidestepped some meetings and
relied on their knowledge and focused on technology. The vendor to his credit
had attempted to engage with the business and had suggested field trips which
were deemed unnecessary by the IT team. Thus the partial understanding created
a solution that evidently did not meet expectations and resulted in frustration
on both sides.
It is the CIOs responsibility to push his/her team to leave their
comfort zones and make the cut; business in most cases is willing to help the
learning. A planned approach to engage from both sides works best; the CIO must
measure the engagement levels and continuously create opportunities on both
sides to appreciate each other’s expertise. Project success is an important
milestone but to move to a trusted partner and advisor takes a lot more. In
this case walking the talk is a difficult journey which the IT team had failed
to do.
Prepare your teams the way you plan your learning, after all your
success depends on them.
No comments:
Post a Comment