Why does the team need to travel
and spend money ? You know well enough that there is pressure on costs and it
is imperative that everyone contribute and IT is no exception. I don’t want to
hear excuses on why it will not work effectively. Get on to a video-conference to understand more about what they have and what they do. Use a bit of
technology to get requirements from these markets; there has already been too
much travel from other functions. I just came back from a review and we have
busted the travel budget.
With this spiel to the CIO and the IT team, the CFO proceeded to travel
to four countries to give the message on cutting cost to the country heads. It
was not important that he always made up his trips last minute and traveled
First Class. It was also not of relevance that just his personal travel budget
was higher than the total IT budget for travel. It did not matter if sub-optimal
solutions were being used by some of the acquired companies and the integration
effort had faltered in the absence of travel authorizations to IT.
The company had leapfrogged into the big league with acquisitions in
quick succession; after an era of organic growth, the change in pace was
exciting. There was a palpable sense of aggression and pride that prevailed
internally and also made news thrusting the company to the pages of business
magazines and newspapers. At the same time there was a bit of uncertainty on
how to work the mechanics of integrating multiple companies simultaneously. As
normal, Consultants were hired and teams created to oversee the process.
Business teams created groups of domain experts who traveled to the
acquired companies globally to meet their counterparts, understand culture,
process and systems used. Teams were mapped and processes reviewed for
compliance to standards and regulatory requirements. All this was fed into a structure
which captured each and every component of the new company beyond the pre-acquisition
due diligence. They followed the best practices laid down by the Big Consulting
Company assisting in the integration.
Weeks became months and progress was good though with one glaring gap;
IT was nowhere to be seen in the picture. The business teams reached out to the
CIO seeking a timeline and calendar that IT would follow in the integration
process. The CIO advised them of the incremental data required and promised to
have his team reach out to the far side. Quickly it was evident that the gap cannot
not be bridged with conference calls and email exchanges. Having executed a
couple of integrations, the CIO realized that he was being setup for failure.
The CIO reached out to the business teams with his constrains and sought
help which was promptly offered since everyone was now feeling the pinch of
unintegrated email systems which bounced messages, lack of information flow and
integration between various systems including financial reporting. Some of the
functions whose success depended on harmonized IT were happy to sponsor. Despite
the urgency, need and demand, ego prevailed and the CFO was unwilling to accede
leaving everyone frustrated and wondering.
It was evident that the deadlock would be difficult to break; in the
absence of an integrated approach taking off, business leaders attempted to use
local solutions. They had to deliver results with synergies and process
improvements, and their dependence on IT was critical. Using personal rapport
with the CIO they validated some of the local solutions that could be deployed
in the short term. Scrounging for budgets they attempted to get these off the
ground; talent crunch and missing strong leadership failed to get them going.
Integration review meetings became a war of words with the CFO finding
excuses and then blaming the CIO for not effectively managing the effort.
Business knew the reality to be otherwise and had reached a situation that they
had no recourse but to accept the fact that the new company will remain
technology challenged for some time to come. The acquired company’s leadership
team too accepted the power play and silently lived in their acceptable level
of inefficiency hoping that someday in the future things would change.
What happened to the CIO and the IT Team ? Well in quick succession many of them found greener pastures leaving the CFO to find other scapegoats for his ego while business struggled to stay afloat.
No comments:
Post a Comment