For many years there have been
predictions that with changing technology and business landscape, the CIO role
will disappear. Triggers were real and imaginary – evolving or disruptive
technology, shift in organization dynamics as a result of external
environmental and economic factors – everyone loved to bash up the CIO and
predicated extinction of the role. The hypothesis became a favorite topic of
discussion in every CIO and technology conference; CIOs attempted to defend
themselves and then decided to ignore the doomsayers.
The existence of the role can be
traced to the turn of the century which demonstrates its recent nature. The
first CIOs evolved from engineering and technology foundation which became a perceived
disadvantage for many since they lacked the social skills and finesse of other longer
tenured CXOs. This did not deter some who with their excellence created
business outcomes that the industry recognized; they became the stars which others
wanted to emulate; after all who does not want to be successful and showered
with adulation ?
Fast forward to current times,
yet another buzz and hype has analysts talking about why the CIO should move on
to becoming the Chief Digital Officer or become extinct. Micro-specializing the
role to a technology or trend seems to be the avenue to create a scare;
forgetting the current complexity and nature of the beast being managed to keep
the business chugging along, growing the company with stable and mature IT
systems acquired over a period of time. CIOs have taken this in their stride by
hiring experts from the outside.
Finding greener pastures in
lateral moves, some CIOs decided to branch off into Human Resources, Supply
Chain, Operations, Corporate Social Responsibility, at times as dual
responsibilities. There has also been a handful who made it to the big corner
office as the CEO of not just IT companies, but even large enterprises where
they had spent time as CIO. The surprise however has been that CIOs from the
first batch now crossing over the half way mark – age of 50+ sounds a bit old –
beginning to seek an alternative calling in life.
·
I want to
be a Coach ! I love interacting with people and helping them be successful; the
training that I acquired over the years has prepared me to be a certified Coach
& Mentor.
·
I would
love to help startups to achieve their growth with better products that someone
will buy; most of them have struggled to create a connect with enterprise use
cases.
·
My life
went by in a whirlwind; I want to catch up with my life and family before it is
too late. I want to enjoy my life pursuing my passions for which I had no time
in my work life.
·
Having
been a CIO for more than 25-30 years, I have been working in automatic mode;
the challenges of the role are no longer enough to stimulate me. I want to do
something different.
Many of my peers from the
industry were getting restless and wanted to get off the treadmill.
The lure of fame, power, money, stock options, was not enough to keep them
interested in their mundane and at times frustrating roles. Their
self-actualization needs were getting starved and for most it was a matter of
time or a trigger that made them take the plunge. In almost every case, the
first reactions from the industry was: OMG
! What happened ? Did something go wrong ? Why did he leave without any options
?
They had set a good teams in
place, working in harmony aligned to optimized processes that ensured minimal
disruption with their departure. Everything continued to work as before though
in a few company’s new initiatives and discussions around technology led
disruption fell silent. The wheels of the enterprise continued to move on their
own until the momentum began to slow down in the absence of the energy that the
CIO brought to the table. Many companies decided to continue the journey while
leaving the position vacant.
What will be the short and
long-term impact of this decision ? None of the analysts, academicians, or the
opinionated have ever attempted to answer this question. If the CIO has thought
it through, s/he would have prepared the next line to scale up to fill the void;
that limits the impact to short-term. Enterprises with checkered history of IT
use and adoption have attempted to park the role with another CXO with a view
that leadership in IT is unimportant. This is where I believe the adverse
effects will be felt for a long time.
No comments:
Post a Comment