Last week I was at a panel discussion
organized by one of the large global IT conference producers, the subject of
the debate, “Creating Leaders”; the panellists some CIOs and some aspiring
ones. It was a great interaction between the panellists and the audience;
everyone had questions and everyone also had answers based on their
experiences. The best parts of the session were the stories as illustrations
and examples of what works; stories are always memorable (see The Story TellerCIO).
Everyone has their definition and opinion
on what constitutes leadership and its development; the CIOs talked about the
skills they look for in their teams to pick high potential performers. The key
tenets were collaboration, empathy, articulation, communication, relationship
building, partnering, business savvy, domain expertise, and attitude. No one
talked about technology, educational qualifications or certifications; no
longer critical once you are in the reckoning for the top job, these are a
given.
On the other hand the aspirers wanted
feedback, coaching, freedom to take decisions, allowing them to fail, engage with
business independently. They wanted to work with the CIO and on represent the CIO
in business meetings. In essence they wanted to get to the chair quicker than
the CIOs believed they can. A healthy competitive spirit with young blood that
makes you feel good off course with practiced restraint where required; failing
fast is not equal to failing frequently said one wise CIO.
The surprise came from the audience when
one of the CIOs who had evolved from the business made a point to the speakers
on the dais and the audience. He talked about the professional expertise that
came in the way of good going to great. The dialogue between the young turks
and the business folks takes shades of impatience and arrogance; “you don’t
understand, let me tell you how, here’s the solution and it’s so obvious …” it
creates polarization separating IT, business and vendors.
He berated the I-factor driven by T with
the IT teams and stated that the when IT teams talk about them versus the rest,
it creates an invisible rift between the stakeholders. He mooted the idea that
IT should stop working with the “I” (me and myself) and start thinking in “we”
terms which improves the possibility of success with shared goals and
objectives. Each person on the table represents different skills and dimensions
of the problem and solution; it is not possible to work without any and achieve
the same success.
Everyone was numbed into silence for a
moment and then spontaneously the room burst into applause; I do not do justice
to his eloquence or story telling here, it touched a part of everyone in the
room. Reciting from ancient scriptures and connecting to the current IT
context, he implored the collective to shed ego and success will follow. Having
created magic in minutes he took his seat and the conversation continued from
where it had left off strongly influenced by the sentiment suspended in the
air.
The power of success weaved into a story
always creates positive energy; the message clear and crisp, the actions
unambiguous, the leadership lesson complete, the panel concluded. As I left the
stage only to be surrounded by some to seek personal advice, the thought at the
back of the mind lingered on; what can I do to transform my team to We(T). We
Team is better than I Team or IT; I need to tell this story to my team on what
we will do differently. Quick, you too do that before the moment is lost !
Very thought provoking insight !!!!!
ReplyDelete